Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) and Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)
MetricTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)
Geospatial Agent Index39* (attempts per task: 2.9)68* (attempts per task: 1.3)
GeoAgentBench score58100
GeoBenchX score4059
Earth-Bench score2819
GeoAnalystBench score3295
Raster and remote sensing score3751
Vector and overlay score4478
Networks and routing score80100
Climate and time series score2632
Spatial statistics and interpolation score1750
Mapping and cartography score2574
Recognising infeasible requests score6761
Cost per task$0.308$0.024
Time per task8.2 min2.1 min
Tokens per attempt982k611k
Turns per attempt32.411.6
Attempts decided278319
Input price per 1M tokens$0.75$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens$3.75$0.50
Context window1,048,576No data
Image inputYesNo data
DeveloperGoogleAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh): 68* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high): 39* (partial coverage)025507510068*Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)39*Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)Anthropic68* (attempts per task: 1.3)66 to 784 of 4319 of 683 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)Google39* (attempts per task: 2.9)13 to 804 of 4278 of 1,167 planned attempts (1 excluded)

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskClaude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh): $0.024 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high): $0.308 (partial coverage)$0$0.100$0.200$0.300$0.400$0.024Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)$0.308Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)Google$0.308835 of 1,167 planned attempts (1 excluded)
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)Anthropic$0.024389 of 683 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh): 2.1 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high): 8.2 min (partial coverage)0m2m4m6m8m2.1 minClaude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)8.2 minGemini 3.8 Flash (high)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)Google8.2 min835 of 1,167 planned attempts (1 excluded)
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)Anthropic2.1 min389 of 683 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)?
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh), at 68 against 39 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high): 278 of 1,167 planned attempts (1 excluded). Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh): 319 of 683 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)?
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh), at $0.024 against $0.308 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)?
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh), at 2.1 min against 8.2 min for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh) has no context window data.

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) · Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh) · all comparisons