Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)?

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), at 65 against 56 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): 870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded). Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max): 342 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.

Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max), at $0.042 against $0.061 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low).

Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)?

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), at 1.0 min against 17.3 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max).

Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)?

They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) and Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)
Metric	Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)	Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)
Geospatial Agent Index	65 (attempts per task: 3)	56* (attempts per task: 1.2)
GeoAgentBench score	83	84
GeoBenchX score	61	32
Earth-Bench score	42	28
GeoAnalystBench score	75	79
Raster and remote sensing score	58	51
Vector and overlay score	69	64
Networks and routing score	93	60
Climate and time series score	67	52
Spatial statistics and interpolation score	51	38
Mapping and cartography score	55	43
Recognising infeasible requests score	71	30
Cost per task	$0.061	$0.042
Time per task	1.0 min	17.3 min
Tokens per attempt	19k	373k
Turns per attempt	3.8	13.5
Attempts decided	870	342
Input price per 1M tokens	$2.00	$0.15
Output price per 1M tokens	$12.00	$0.50
Context window	1,048,576	1,048,576
Image input	Yes	Yes
Developer	Google	Z.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index

Geospatial Agent Index
Model	Creator	Geospatial Agent Index	Range while attempts are pending	Benchmarks covered	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)	Google	65 (attempts per task: 3)	No pending judgements	4 of 4	870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)	Z.ai	56* (attempts per task: 1.2)	55 to 56	4 of 4	342 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Cost per task

Cost per task
Model	Creator	Cost per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)	Google	$0.061	870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)	Z.ai	$0.042	347 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Time per task

Time per task
Model	Creator	Time per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)	Google	1.0 min	870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)	Z.ai	17.3 min	347 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)?: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), at 65 against 56 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): 870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded). Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max): 342 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max), at $0.042 against $0.061 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)?: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), at 1.0 min against 17.3 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max)?: They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) · Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (max) · all comparisons