Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at 66 against 65 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): 870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded). Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): 380 of 870 planned attempts (4 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.

Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at $0.028 against $0.061 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low).

Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), at 1.0 min against 10.3 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low).

Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?

They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) and Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)
Metric	Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)	Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)
Geospatial Agent Index	65 (attempts per task: 3)	66* (attempts per task: 1.4)
GeoAgentBench score	83	95
GeoBenchX score	61	49
Earth-Bench score	42	27
GeoAnalystBench score	75	92
Raster and remote sensing score	58	61
Vector and overlay score	69	69
Networks and routing score	93	100
Climate and time series score	67	54
Spatial statistics and interpolation score	51	57
Mapping and cartography score	55	68
Recognising infeasible requests score	71	35
Cost per task	$0.061	$0.028
Time per task	1.0 min	10.3 min
Tokens per attempt	19k	274k
Turns per attempt	3.8	12.1
Attempts decided	870	380
Input price per 1M tokens	$2.00	$0.15
Output price per 1M tokens	$12.00	$0.50
Context window	1,048,576	1,048,576
Image input	Yes	Yes
Developer	Google	Z.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index

Geospatial Agent Index
Model	Creator	Geospatial Agent Index	Range while attempts are pending	Benchmarks covered	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)	Z.ai	66* (attempts per task: 1.4)	61 to 67	4 of 4	380 of 870 planned attempts (4 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)	Google	65 (attempts per task: 3)	No pending judgements	4 of 4	870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Cost per task

Cost per task
Model	Creator	Cost per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)	Google	$0.061	870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)	Z.ai	$0.028	414 of 870 planned attempts (4 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Time per task

Time per task
Model	Creator	Time per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)	Google	1.0 min	870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)	Z.ai	10.3 min	414 of 870 planned attempts (4 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at 66 against 65 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): 870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded). Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): 380 of 870 planned attempts (4 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at $0.028 against $0.061 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), at 1.0 min against 10.3 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?: They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) · Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) · all comparisons