Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) and Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)
MetricTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)
Geospatial Agent Index65 (attempts per task: 3)40 (attempts per task: 3)
GeoAgentBench score8343
GeoBenchX score6139
Earth-Bench score4235
GeoAnalystBench score7542
Raster and remote sensing score5836
Vector and overlay score6946
Networks and routing score9333
Climate and time series score6744
Spatial statistics and interpolation score5129
Mapping and cartography score5550
Recognising infeasible requests score7133
Cost per task$0.061$0.030
Time per task1.0 min9.2 min
Tokens per attempt19k419k
Turns per attempt3.817.9
Attempts decided870870
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$0.06
Output price per 1M tokens$12.00$0.40
Context window1,048,576131,072
Image inputYesNo
DeveloperGoogleZ.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): 65; Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 40025507510065Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)40GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)Google65 (attempts per task: 3)No pending judgements4 of 4870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Z.ai40 (attempts per task: 3)No pending judgements4 of 4870 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskTerminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): $0.030; Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): $0.061$0$0.020$0.040$0.060$0.080$0.030GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)$0.061Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)Google$0.061870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Z.ai$0.030870 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Time per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): 1.0 min; Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 9.2 min0m2m5m8m10m1.0 minGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)9.2 minGLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low)Google1.0 min870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded)
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Z.ai9.2 min870 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), at 65 against 40 for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low): 870 of 870 planned attempts (22 excluded). Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 870 of 870 planned attempts.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on), at $0.030 against $0.061 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), at 1.0 min against 9.2 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low), at 1,048,576 tokens against 131,072 tokens for Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on).

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (low) · Terminus-2 – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) · all comparisons