Axis Spatial

Search modelsMenu

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) vs MiniMax M3 (Reasoning)

Results updated 1 November 2026 · In Terminus-2 and MiniMax Code, so part of any gap can come from the harness · How we benchmark

Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Not yet rankedno GS-QA2 score yet
MiniMax M3 (Reasoning)68Geospatial Agent Index · rank 48 of 82

Not comparable yet: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) is not yet ranked.

Cost per task
$0.22 vs $0.15
Time per task
2.5 min vs 4.9 min (estimated)
Tokens per attempt
69k vs 1.68M
Image input
Yes vs Yes

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 scores higher on GeoBenchX; MiniMax M3 (Reasoning), MiniMax Code scores higher on Earth-Bench V2. MiniMax M3 (Reasoning), MiniMax Code is cheaper ($0.15 against $0.22 per task), but Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 is faster (2.5 min against 4.9 min).

Not yet ranked. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2: no GS-QA2 score yet. Not in the Agent Index, cost and time charts until it has a score on every index evaluation. Results so far are in the side-by-side table.

Where they differ most

By kind of work, share of tasks passed, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Kind of workGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)MiniMax M3 (Reasoning)
Recognising infeasible requests9733
GIS analysis4081
Making maps5677
Remote sensing and raster analysis6173
World map of the places the tasks are setWhere the tasks are set: each kind of work links to its tasks and scores
Leaderboard

Charts for each: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 · MiniMax M3 (Reasoning), MiniMax Code.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 vs. MiniMax M3 (Reasoning), MiniMax Code
MetricGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2MiniMax M3 (Reasoning), MiniMax Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only6668
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score5968
GeoBenchX score7359
GS-QA2 scoreNo data78
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8694
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9579
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data94
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data93
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data73
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data92
Remote sensing and raster analysis score6173
GIS analysis score4081
Climate and time series score7374
Spatial statistics score5462
Making maps score5677
Recognising infeasible requests score9733
Cost per task$0.22$0.15
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)2.5 min4.9 min (estimated)
Tokens per attempt69k1.68M
Turns per attempt6.9No data
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$0.30
Output price per 1M tokens$12.00$1.20
Context window1,048,5761,048,576
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleMiniMax

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 or MiniMax M3 (Reasoning), MiniMax Code?
Not comparable yet: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 is not yet ranked (no GS-QA2 score yet).
Which is cheaper per task, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 or MiniMax M3 (Reasoning), MiniMax Code?
MiniMax M3 (Reasoning), MiniMax Code, $0.15 to $0.22.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 or MiniMax M3 (Reasoning), MiniMax Code?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2, 13k to 29k.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 or MiniMax M3 (Reasoning), MiniMax Code?
They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.