Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) and Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)
MetricTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)
Geospatial Agent Index75 (attempts per task: 3)74* (attempts per task: 1.2)
GeoAgentBench score9495
GeoBenchX score6555
Earth-Bench score5451
GeoAnalystBench score8695
Raster and remote sensing score6773
Vector and overlay score7881
Networks and routing score93100
Climate and time series score8277
Spatial statistics and interpolation score7269
Mapping and cartography score5772
Recognising infeasible requests score7537
Cost per task$0.252$0.359
Time per task3.4 min9.6 min
Tokens per attempt73k370k
Turns per attempt7.112.1
Attempts decided870338
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$1.40
Output price per 1M tokens$12.00$4.40
Context window1,048,576262,144
Image inputYesNo
DeveloperGoogleZ.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 75; Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 74* (partial coverage)025507510075Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)74*GLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google75 (attempts per task: 3)No pending judgements4 of 4870 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai74* (attempts per task: 1.2)74 to 744 of 4338 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded)

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): $0.252; Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): $0.359 (partial coverage)$0$0.100$0.200$0.300$0.400$0.252Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)$0.359GLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google$0.252870 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai$0.359342 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 3.4 min; Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 9.6 min (partial coverage)0m2m5m8m10m3.4 minGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)9.6 minGLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google3.4 min870 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai9.6 min342 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), at 75 against 74 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 338 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), at $0.252 against $0.359 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), at 3.4 min against 9.6 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) · Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) · all comparisons