Axis Spatial

Search modelsMenu

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)

Results updated 31 October 2026 · In Terminus-2 and Claude Code, so part of any gap can come from the harness · How we benchmark

Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Not yet rankedno GS-QA2 score yet
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)68Geospatial Agent Index · rank 49 of 80

Not comparable yet: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) is not yet ranked.

Cost per task
$0.22 vs $0.20
Time per task
2.5 min vs 10.9 min
Tokens per attempt
69k vs 1.58M
Image input
Yes vs Yes

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 scores higher than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Claude Code on all 2 evaluations scored for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Claude Code is cheaper ($0.20 against $0.22 per task), but Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 is faster (2.5 min against 10.9 min).

Not yet ranked. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2: no GS-QA2 score yet. Not in the Agent Index, cost and time charts until it has a score on every index evaluation. Results so far are in the side-by-side table.

Where they differ most

By kind of work, share of tasks passed, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Kind of workGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)
Recognising infeasible requests9740
GIS analysis4092
Spatial statistics5431
Making maps5672
World map of the places the tasks are setWhere the tasks are set: each kind of work links to its tasks and scores
Leaderboard

Charts for each: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Claude Code.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Claude Code
MetricGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only6668
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score5958
GeoBenchX score7355
GS-QA2 scoreNo data89
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8696
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)95100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data79
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data64
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data84
Remote sensing and raster analysis score6175
GIS analysis score4092
Climate and time series score7364
Spatial statistics score5431
Making maps score5672
Recognising infeasible requests score9740
Cost per task$0.22$0.20
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)2.5 min10.9 min
Tokens per attempt69k1.58M
Turns per attempt6.926.0
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$0.30
Output price per 1M tokens$12.00$1.20
Context window1,048,5761,048,576
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleDeepSeek

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Claude Code?
Not comparable yet: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 is not yet ranked (no GS-QA2 score yet).
Which is cheaper per task, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Claude Code?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Claude Code, $0.20 to $0.22.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Claude Code?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2, 13k to 48k.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), Terminus-2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.