Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) and Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)
MetricTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)
Geospatial Agent Index75 (attempts per task: 3)76* (attempts per task: 2.2)
GeoAgentBench score9498
GeoBenchX score6566
Earth-Bench score5444
GeoAnalystBench score8695
Raster and remote sensing score6769
Vector and overlay score7878
Networks and routing score93100
Climate and time series score8265
Spatial statistics and interpolation score7277
Mapping and cartography score5777
Recognising infeasible requests score7559
Cost per task$0.252$0.053
Time per task3.4 min0.6 min
Tokens per attempt73k73k
Turns per attempt7.13.7
Attempts decided870580
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$12.00$10.00
Context window1,048,576No data
Image inputYesNo data
DeveloperGoogleAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): 76* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 75025507510076*Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)75Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)Anthropic76* (attempts per task: 2.2)71 to 764 of 4580 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google75 (attempts per task: 3)No pending judgements4 of 4870 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): $0.053 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): $0.252$0$0.075$0.150$0.225$0.300$0.053Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)$0.252Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google$0.252870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)Anthropic$0.053627 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): 0.6 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 3.4 min0m1m2m3m4m0.6 minClaude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)3.4 minGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google3.4 min870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)Anthropic0.6 min627 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), at 76 against 75 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): 580 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), at $0.053 against $0.252 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), at 0.6 min against 3.4 min for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium) has no context window data.

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) · Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium) · all comparisons