Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) and Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)
MetricTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)
Geospatial Agent Index75 (attempts per task: 3)82* (attempts per task: 2.5)
GeoAgentBench score9496
GeoBenchX score6566
Earth-Bench score5467
GeoAnalystBench score86100
Raster and remote sensing score6783
Vector and overlay score7883
Networks and routing score93100
Climate and time series score8279
Spatial statistics and interpolation score7262
Mapping and cartography score5778
Recognising infeasible requests score7559
Cost per task$0.252$0.167
Time per task3.4 min1.0 min
Tokens per attempt73k126k
Turns per attempt7.15.7
Attempts decided870531
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$4.00
Output price per 1M tokens$12.00$20.00
Context window1,048,576No data
Image inputYesNo data
DeveloperGoogleAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): 82* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 75025507510082*Claude Opus 5.5 (high)75Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Anthropic82* (attempts per task: 2.5)63 to 844 of 4531 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google75 (attempts per task: 3)No pending judgements4 of 4870 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): $0.167 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): $0.252$0$0.075$0.150$0.225$0.300$0.167Claude Opus 5.5 (high)$0.252Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google$0.252870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Anthropic$0.167719 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): 1.0 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 3.4 min0m1m2m3m4m1.0 minClaude Opus 5.5 (high)3.4 minGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google3.4 min870 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Anthropic1.0 min719 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high), at 82 against 75 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): 531 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high), at $0.167 against $0.252 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high), at 1.0 min against 3.4 min for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) or Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) has no context window data.

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) · Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) · all comparisons