Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at 66 against 34 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal): 869 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): 380 of 870 planned attempts (4 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.

Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), at $0.0056 against $0.028 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low).

Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), at 0.5 min against 10.3 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low).

Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?

They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) and Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)
Metric	Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)	Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)
Geospatial Agent Index	34* (attempts per task: 3)	66* (attempts per task: 1.4)
GeoAgentBench score	33	95
GeoBenchX score	40	49
Earth-Bench score	28	27
GeoAnalystBench score	37	92
Raster and remote sensing score	30	61
Vector and overlay score	22	69
Networks and routing score	0	100
Climate and time series score	43	54
Spatial statistics and interpolation score	17	57
Mapping and cartography score	39	68
Recognising infeasible requests score	50	35
Cost per task	$0.0056	$0.028
Time per task	0.5 min	10.3 min
Tokens per attempt	18k	274k
Turns per attempt	3.5	12.1
Attempts decided	869	380
Input price per 1M tokens	$0.25	$0.15
Output price per 1M tokens	$1.50	$0.50
Context window	1,048,576	1,048,576
Image input	Yes	Yes
Developer	Google	Z.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index

Geospatial Agent Index
Model	Creator	Geospatial Agent Index	Range while attempts are pending	Benchmarks covered	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)	Z.ai	66* (attempts per task: 1.4)	61 to 67	4 of 4	380 of 870 planned attempts (4 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)	Google	34* (attempts per task: 3)	No pending judgements; coverage incomplete	4 of 4	869 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Cost per task

Cost per task
Model	Creator	Cost per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)	Google	$0.0056	869 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)	Z.ai	$0.028	414 of 870 planned attempts (4 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Time per task

Time per task
Model	Creator	Time per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)	Google	0.5 min	869 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)	Z.ai	10.3 min	414 of 870 planned attempts (4 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low), at 66 against 34 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal): 869 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low): 380 of 870 planned attempts (4 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), at $0.0056 against $0.028 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), at 0.5 min against 10.3 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low)?: They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) · Terminus-2 – GLM-5.3-Flash (low) · all comparisons