Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) vs. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) and Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) vs. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)
MetricTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)
Geospatial Agent Index34* (attempts per task: 3)75 (attempts per task: 3)
GeoAgentBench score3394
GeoBenchX score4065
Earth-Bench score2854
GeoAnalystBench score3786
Raster and remote sensing score3067
Vector and overlay score2278
Networks and routing score093
Climate and time series score4382
Spatial statistics and interpolation score1772
Mapping and cartography score3957
Recognising infeasible requests score5075
Cost per task$0.0056$0.252
Time per task0.5 min3.4 min
Tokens per attempt18k73k
Turns per attempt3.57.1
Attempts decided869870
Input price per 1M tokens$0.25$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$1.50$12.00
Context window1,048,5761,048,576
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleGoogle

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 75; Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal): 34* (partial coverage)025507510075Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)34*Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google75 (attempts per task: 3)No pending judgements4 of 4870 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)Google34* (attempts per task: 3)No pending judgements; coverage incomplete4 of 4869 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal): $0.0056 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): $0.252$0$0.075$0.150$0.225$0.300$0.0056Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)$0.252Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)Google$0.0056869 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google$0.252870 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal): 0.5 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 3.4 min0m1m2m3m4m0.5 minGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)3.4 minGemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)Google0.5 min869 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)Google3.4 min870 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high), at 75 against 34 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal): 869 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), at $0.0056 against $0.252 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), at 0.5 min against 3.4 min for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high)?
They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal) · Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) (high) · all comparisons