Axis Spatial

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2 against Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only3269
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data71
Earth-Bench V2 score3456
GeoBenchX score4477
GS-QA2 score1876
Vision agents scoreNo data78
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)4294
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)4295
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data96
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data77
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score2769
GIS analysis score1375
Climate and time series score3259
Spatial statistics score038
Making maps score4084
Recognising infeasible requests score6580
Cost per task$0.0066$0.043
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.6 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt23k70k
Turns per attempt4.93.9
Input price per 1M tokens$0.25$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$1.50$10.00
Context window1,048,5761,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 69; Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2: 32025507510069Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)32Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic69
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2Google32

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2: $0.0066; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.043$0$0.015$0.03$0.045$0.06$0.0066Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)$0.043Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2Google$0.0066
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.043

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2: 2k01k2k3k4k1kClaude Sonnet 5.5 (low)2kGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2Google2k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 69 to 32.
Which is cheaper per task, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2, $0.0066 to $0.043.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 2k.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2, 1,048,576 tokens to 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (minimal), Terminus-2 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons