Axis Spatial

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 against Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
MetricGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only4820
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score4329
GeoBenchX score5121
GS-QA2 score499
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)5226
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)6316
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5117
GIS analysis score426
Climate and time series score4627
Spatial statistics score80
Making maps score5416
Recognising infeasible requests score6233
Cost per task$0.018$0.13
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)1.7 min4.9 min
Tokens per attempt60k589k
Turns per attempt8.830.7
Input price per 1M tokens$0.25$0.20
Output price per 1M tokens$1.50$0.80
Context window1,048,576256,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleNVIDIA

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: 48; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 20025507510048Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)20Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google48
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA20

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: $0.018; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.13$0$0.05$0.10$0.15$0.20$0.018Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)$0.13Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google$0.018
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.13

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: 8k; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 22k010k20k30k40k8kGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)22kNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google8k
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA22k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2, 48 to 20.
Which is cheaper per task, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2, $0.018 to $0.13.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2, 8k to 22k.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2, 1,048,576 tokens to 256,000 tokens.

More: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · All comparisons