Axis Spatial

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
MetricGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only4811
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo dataNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score4316
GeoBenchX score5112
GS-QA2 score494
Vision agents scoreNo dataNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)5210
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)6332
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5111
GIS analysis score427
Climate and time series score4615
Spatial statistics score80
Making maps score547
Recognising infeasible requests score6212
Cost per task$0.018$0.012
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)1.7 min4.9 min
Tokens per attempt60k249k
Turns per attempt8.817.3
Input price per 1M tokens$0.25$0.070
Output price per 1M tokens$1.50$0.20
Context window1,048,576262,144
Image inputYesNo
DeveloperGoogleNVIDIA

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: 48; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 11025507510048Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)11Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google48
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA11

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.012; Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: $0.018$0$0.005$0.01$0.015$0.02$0.012Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)$0.018Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.012
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google$0.018

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 6k; Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: 8k02k4k6k8k6kNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)8kGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA6k
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google8k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2, 48 to 11.
Which is cheaper per task, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, $0.012 to $0.018.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 6k to 8k.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2, 1,048,576 tokens to 262,144 tokens.

More: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · All comparisons