Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?

Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max), at 74 against 49 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 338 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.

Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at $0.012 against $0.359 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).

Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at 1.0 min against 9.6 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).

Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) and Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)
Metric	Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)	Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)
Geospatial Agent Index	49 (attempts per task: 3)	74* (attempts per task: 1.2)
GeoAgentBench score	52	95
GeoBenchX score	46	55
Earth-Bench score	40	51
GeoAnalystBench score	60	95
Raster and remote sensing score	46	73
Vector and overlay score	46	81
Networks and routing score	53	100
Climate and time series score	56	77
Spatial statistics and interpolation score	29	69
Mapping and cartography score	50	72
Recognising infeasible requests score	48	37
Cost per task	$0.012	$0.359
Time per task	1.0 min	9.6 min
Tokens per attempt	37k	370k
Turns per attempt	5.1	12.1
Attempts decided	870	338
Input price per 1M tokens	$0.25	$1.40
Output price per 1M tokens	$1.50	$4.40
Context window	1,048,576	262,144
Image input	Yes	No
Developer	Google	Z.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index

Geospatial Agent Index
Model	Creator	Geospatial Agent Index	Range while attempts are pending	Benchmarks covered	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)	Z.ai	74* (attempts per task: 1.2)	74 to 74	4 of 4	338 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)	Google	49 (attempts per task: 3)	No pending judgements	4 of 4	870 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Cost per task

Cost per task
Model	Creator	Cost per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)	Google	$0.012	870 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)	Z.ai	$0.359	342 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Time per task

Time per task
Model	Creator	Time per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)	Google	1.0 min	870 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)	Z.ai	9.6 min	342 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?: Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max), at 74 against 49 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 338 of 870 planned attempts (1 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at $0.012 against $0.359 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at 1.0 min against 9.6 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) · Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) · all comparisons