Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) vs. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high): geospatial agent comparison
Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) and Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.
Side by side
| Metric | Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) | Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Geospatial Agent Index | 51* (attempts per task: 2.9) | 39* (attempts per task: 2.9) |
| GeoAgentBench score | 52 | 58 |
| GeoBenchX score | 43 | 40 |
| Earth-Bench score | 31 | 28 |
| GeoAnalystBench score | 79 | 32 |
| Raster and remote sensing score | 41 | 37 |
| Vector and overlay score | 44 | 44 |
| Networks and routing score | 80 | 80 |
| Climate and time series score | 63 | 26 |
| Spatial statistics and interpolation score | 25 | 17 |
| Mapping and cartography score | 49 | 25 |
| Recognising infeasible requests score | 47 | 67 |
| Cost per task | $0.011 | $0.308 |
| Time per task | 1.0 min | 8.2 min |
| Tokens per attempt | 34k | 982k |
| Turns per attempt | 4.9 | 32.4 |
| Attempts decided | 278 | 278 |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $0.25 | $0.75 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $1.50 | $3.75 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Image input | Yes | Yes |
| Developer |
Charts
Geospatial Agent Index
Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
| Model | Creator | Geospatial Agent Index | Range while attempts are pending | Benchmarks covered | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) | 51* (attempts per task: 2.9) | 17 to 84 | 4 of 4 | 278 of 1,167 planned attempts | |
| Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) | 39* (attempts per task: 2.9) | 13 to 80 | 4 of 4 | 278 of 1,167 planned attempts (1 excluded) |
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)Cost per task
Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Cost per task
| Model | Creator | Cost per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) | $0.011 | 834 of 1,167 planned attempts | |
| Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) | $0.308 | 835 of 1,167 planned attempts (1 excluded) |
Time per task
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Time per task
| Model | Creator | Time per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) | 1.0 min | 834 of 1,167 planned attempts | |
| Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) | 8.2 min | 835 of 1,167 planned attempts (1 excluded) |
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at 51 against 39 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low): 278 of 1,167 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high): 278 of 1,167 planned attempts (1 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at $0.011 against $0.308 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at 1.0 min against 8.2 min for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)?
They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.
More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) · Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) · all comparisons