Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)?

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high), at 59 against 49 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high): 864 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.

Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)?

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at $0.012 against $0.021 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high).

Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)?

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at 1.0 min against 1.9 min for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high).

Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)?

They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) vs. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) and Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) vs. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)
Metric	Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)	Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)
Geospatial Agent Index	49 (attempts per task: 3)	59* (attempts per task: 3)
GeoAgentBench score	52	69
GeoBenchX score	46	53
Earth-Bench score	40	43
GeoAnalystBench score	60	70
Raster and remote sensing score	46	54
Vector and overlay score	46	65
Networks and routing score	53	60
Climate and time series score	56	57
Spatial statistics and interpolation score	29	46
Mapping and cartography score	50	66
Recognising infeasible requests score	48	48
Cost per task	$0.012	$0.021
Time per task	1.0 min	1.9 min
Tokens per attempt	37k	52k
Turns per attempt	5.1	5.9
Attempts decided	870	864
Input price per 1M tokens	$0.25	$0.25
Output price per 1M tokens	$1.50	$1.50
Context window	1,048,576	1,048,576
Image input	Yes	Yes
Developer	Google	Google

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Geospatial Agent Index

Geospatial Agent Index
Model	Creator	Geospatial Agent Index	Range while attempts are pending	Benchmarks covered	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)	Google	59* (attempts per task: 3)	59 to 59	4 of 4	864 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)	Google	49 (attempts per task: 3)	No pending judgements	4 of 4	870 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Cost per task

Cost per task
Model	Creator	Cost per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)	Google	$0.012	870 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)	Google	$0.021	865 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Partial coverage

Data table: Time per task

Time per task
Model	Creator	Time per task	Coverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)	Google	1.0 min	870 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)	Google	1.9 min	865 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)?: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high), at 59 against 49 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high): 864 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)?: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at $0.012 against $0.021 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)?: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), at 1.0 min against 1.9 min for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)?: They are level, at 1,048,576 tokens.

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low) · Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) · all comparisons