Axis Spatial

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 against Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only4869
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data71
Earth-Bench V2 score4356
GeoBenchX score5177
GS-QA2 score4976
Vision agents scoreNo data78
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)5294
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)6395
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data96
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data77
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5169
GIS analysis score4275
Climate and time series score4659
Spatial statistics score838
Making maps score5484
Recognising infeasible requests score6280
Cost per task$0.018$0.043
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)1.7 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt60k70k
Turns per attempt8.83.9
Input price per 1M tokens$0.25$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$1.50$10.00
Context window1,048,5761,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 69; Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: 48025507510069Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)48Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic69
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google48

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: $0.018; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.043$0$0.015$0.03$0.045$0.06$0.018Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)$0.043Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google$0.018
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.043

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: 8k02k4k6k8k1kClaude Sonnet 5.5 (low)8kGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google8k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 69 to 48.
Which is cheaper per task, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2, $0.018 to $0.043.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 8k.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2, 1,048,576 tokens to 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons