Axis Spatial

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 against Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only4874
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data78
Earth-Bench V2 score4359
GeoBenchX score5177
GS-QA2 score4986
Vision agents scoreNo data89
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)5296
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)63100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data95
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data79
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score5179
GIS analysis score4284
Climate and time series score4659
Spatial statistics score877
Making maps score5477
Recognising infeasible requests score6277
Cost per task$0.018$0.081
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)1.7 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt60k63k
Turns per attempt8.83.5
Input price per 1M tokens$0.25$4.00
Output price per 1M tokens$1.50$20.00
Context window1,048,5761,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 74; Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: 48025507510074Claude Opus 5.5 (low)48Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic74
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google48

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: $0.018; Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.081$0$0.025$0.05$0.075$0.10$0.018Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)$0.081Claude Opus 5.5 (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google$0.018
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.081

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2: 8k02k4k6k8k1kClaude Opus 5.5 (low)8kGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2Google8k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 74 to 48.
Which is cheaper per task, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2, $0.018 to $0.081.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 8k.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2, 1,048,576 tokens to 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (low), Terminus-2 · Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons