Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) vs. Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) and Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) vs. Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on)
MetricTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on)
Geospatial Agent Index59* (attempts per task: 3)72 (attempts per task: 3)
GeoAgentBench score6995
GeoBenchX score5357
Earth-Bench score4349
GeoAnalystBench score7089
Raster and remote sensing score5472
Vector and overlay score6576
Networks and routing score6093
Climate and time series score5771
Spatial statistics and interpolation score4657
Mapping and cartography score6673
Recognising infeasible requests score4845
Cost per task$0.021$0.072
Time per task1.9 min6.8 min
Tokens per attempt52k140k
Turns per attempt5.911.3
Attempts decided864870
Input price per 1M tokens$0.25$0.95
Output price per 1M tokens$1.50$4.00
Context window1,048,576262,144
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperGoogleMoonshot AI

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on): 72; Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high): 59* (partial coverage)025507510072Kimi K2.6 (always on)59*Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on)Moonshot AI72 (attempts per task: 3)No pending judgements4 of 4870 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)Google59* (attempts per task: 3)59 to 594 of 4864 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded)

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high): $0.021 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on): $0.072$0$0.020$0.040$0.060$0.080$0.021Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)$0.072Kimi K2.6 (always on)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)Google$0.021865 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on)Moonshot AI$0.072870 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high): 1.9 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on): 6.8 min0m2m4m6m8m1.9 minGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)6.8 minKimi K2.6 (always on)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high)Google1.9 min865 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded)
Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on)Moonshot AI6.8 min870 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on)?
Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on), at 72 against 59 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high): 864 of 870 planned attempts (6 excluded). Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on): 870 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high), at $0.021 against $0.072 for Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high), at 1.9 min against 6.8 min for Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) or Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on).

More: Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (high) · Terminus-2 – Kimi K2.6 (always on) · all comparisons