Axis Spatial

DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2

DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2 against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2 vs. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only6911
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo image inputNo data
Earth-Bench V2 score6616
GeoBenchX score6212
GS-QA2 score804
Vision agents scoreNo image inputNo data
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9610
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9532
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No dataNo data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score7811
GIS analysis score757
Climate and time series score6615
Spatial statistics score230
Making maps score797
Recognising infeasible requests score5312
Cost per task$0.062$0.012
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)5.7 min4.9 min
Tokens per attempt303k249k
Turns per attempt14.417.3
Input price per 1M tokens$0.44$0.070
Output price per 1M tokens$1.32$0.20
Context window1,048,576262,144
Image inputNoNo
DeveloperDeepSeekNVIDIA

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 69; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 11025507510069DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)11Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2DeepSeek69
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA11

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: $0.012; DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2: $0.062$0$0.02$0.04$0.06$0.08$0.012Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)$0.062DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA$0.012
DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2DeepSeek$0.062

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2: 6k; DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2: 29k010k20k30k40k6kNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning)29kDeepSeek V4 Flash (max)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2NVIDIA6k
DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2DeepSeek29k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2, 69 to 11.
Which is cheaper per task, DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, $0.012 to $0.062.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2, 6k to 29k.
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2, 1,048,576 tokens to 262,144 tokens.

More: DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), Terminus-2 · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (Reasoning), Terminus-2 · All comparisons