Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) and Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) vs. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)
MetricTerminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)
Geospatial Agent Index74* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)75* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score9897
GeoBenchX score5355
Earth-Bench score4652
GeoAnalystBench score10095
Raster and remote sensing score7073
Vector and overlay score7281
Networks and routing score100100
Climate and time series score7379
Spatial statistics and interpolation score5675
Mapping and cartography score7572
Recognising infeasible requests score4137
Cost per task$0.067$0.362
Time per task9.1 min9.3 min
Tokens per attempt280k363k
Turns per attempt13.212.0
Attempts decided321306
Input price per 1M tokens$0.44$1.40
Output price per 1M tokens$1.32$4.40
Context window1,048,576262,144
Image inputNoNo
DeveloperDeepSeekZ.ai

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 75* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): 74* (partial coverage)025507510075*GLM-5.2 (max)74*DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai75* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)72 to 754 of 4306 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)DeepSeek74* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)73 to 744 of 4321 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): $0.067 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): $0.362 (partial coverage)$0$0.100$0.200$0.300$0.400$0.067DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)$0.362GLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)DeepSeek$0.067329 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai$0.362324 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskTerminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): 9.1 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 9.3 min (partial coverage)0m2m5m8m10m9.1 minDeepSeek V4 Flash (max)9.3 minGLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)DeepSeek9.1 min329 of 870 planned attempts
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)Z.ai9.3 min324 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max), at 75 against 74 for Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max). Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): 321 of 870 planned attempts. Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max): 306 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), at $0.067 against $0.362 for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), at 9.1 min against 9.3 min for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max).

More: Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) · Terminus-2 – GLM-5.2 (max) · all comparisons