Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) vs. Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) and Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) vs. Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max)
MetricTerminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max)
Geospatial Agent Index59*53* (partial: attempt 1 on 200 of 565 tasks)
Earth-Bench V2 score5263
GeoBenchX score5442
GS-QA2 score72No data
GeoAgentBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index)96No data
GeoAnalystBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index)95No data
Raster and remote sensing score6662
Vector and overlay score6540
Networks and routing scoreNo dataNo data
Climate and time series score5967
Spatial statistics and interpolation score21No data
Mapping and cartography score76No data
Recognising infeasible requests score4141
Cost per task$0.062$0.437
Time per task9.7 min7.1 min
Tokens per attempt301k827k
Turns per attempt14.918.7
Attempts decided565120
Input price per 1M tokens$0.44$1.40
Output price per 1M tokens$1.32$4.40
Context window1,048,576262,144
Image inputNoNo
DeveloperDeepSeekZ.ai

Charts

Partial coverage. Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max): 35 of 147 Earth-Bench V2 tasks; 165 of 173 GeoBenchX tasks; GS-QA2 incomplete. Grey placeholders identify these entries in the index, cost and output token charts; their height does not represent a value. Comparable bars appear when first-attempt coverage is complete. Their available results remain in the side-by-side table.

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Planned attempts still to come
Geospatial Agent IndexTerminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): 59* (partial coverage); Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max): Partial025507510059*DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)PartialGLM-5.2 (max)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)DeepSeek59*No pending judgements; coverage incomplete; 177 results awaiting review; 1 trace review declined by the judge3 of 3565 of 859 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Planned attempts still to come
Cost per taskTerminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): $0.062 (partial coverage); Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max): Partial$0$0.020$0.040$0.060$0.080$0.062DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)PartialGLM-5.2 (max)
How to read this chart

Not shown: partial coverage. Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max).

Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)DeepSeek$0.062565 of 859 planned attempts

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

  • Planned attempts still to come
Output tokens per taskTerminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): 31k (partial coverage); Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max): Partial010k20k30k40k31kDeepSeek V4 Flash (max)PartialGLM-5.2 (max)
How to read this chart

Not shown: partial coverage. Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max).

Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelCreatorOutput tokens per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)DeepSeek31k565 of 859 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Not comparable yet: Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max) has partial coverage (35 of 147 Earth-Bench V2 tasks; 165 of 173 GeoBenchX tasks; GS-QA2 incomplete), so it is not ranked. Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): 565 of 859 planned attempts. Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max): 120 of 614 planned attempts (9 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), at $0.062 against $0.437 for Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), at 31k against 34k for Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max)?
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max), at 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144 tokens for Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max).

More: Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) · Claude Code – GLM-5.2 (max) · all comparisons