Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) and Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)
MetricTerminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)
Geospatial Agent Index74* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)77* (partial: 2 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score9898
GeoBenchX score5366
Earth-Bench score4645
GeoAnalystBench score10097
Raster and remote sensing score7070
Vector and overlay score7281
Networks and routing score100100
Climate and time series score7365
Spatial statistics and interpolation score5679
Mapping and cartography score7578
Recognising infeasible requests score4159
Cost per task$0.067$0.052
Time per task9.1 min0.6 min
Tokens per attempt280k72k
Turns per attempt13.23.7
Attempts decided321500
Input price per 1M tokens$0.44$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$1.32$10.00
Context window1,048,576No data
Image inputNoNo data
DeveloperDeepSeekAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): 77* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): 74* (partial coverage)025507510077*Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)74*DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)Anthropic77* (partial: 2 of 3 attempts)67 to 774 of 4500 of 870 planned attempts (229 excluded)
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)DeepSeek74* (partial: 1.1 of 3 attempts)73 to 744 of 4321 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): $0.052 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): $0.067 (partial coverage)$0$0.020$0.040$0.060$0.080$0.052Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)$0.067DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)DeepSeek$0.067329 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)Anthropic$0.052568 of 870 planned attempts (229 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): 0.6 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): 9.1 min (partial coverage)0m2m5m8m10m0.6 minClaude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)9.1 minDeepSeek V4 Flash (max)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max)DeepSeek9.1 min329 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)Anthropic0.6 min568 of 870 planned attempts (229 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), at 77 against 74 for Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max). Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max): 321 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): 500 of 870 planned attempts (229 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), at $0.052 against $0.067 for Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium), at 0.6 min against 9.1 min for Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium) has no context window data.

More: Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) · Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium) · all comparisons