Axis Spatial

Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) and Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
MetricTerminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
Geospatial Agent Index70*81* (partial: 1.9 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score95100
GeoBenchX score5467
Earth-Bench score3758
GeoAnalystBench score9397
Raster and remote sensing score6679
Vector and overlay score7281
Networks and routing score87100
Climate and time series score5879
Spatial statistics and interpolation score5873
Mapping and cartography score7676
Recognising infeasible requests score4061
Cost per task$0.067$0.062
Time per task9.7 min0.7 min
Tokens per attempt312k95k
Turns per attempt14.34.6
Attempts decided860479
Input price per 1M tokens$0.44$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$1.32$10.00
Context window1,048,576No data
Image inputNoNo data
DeveloperDeepSeekAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 81* (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high): 70* (partial coverage)025507510081*Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)70*DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic81* (partial: 1.9 of 3 attempts)71 to 824 of 4479 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)DeepSeek70*70 to 714 of 4860 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): $0.062 (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high): $0.067 (partial coverage)$0$0.020$0.040$0.060$0.080$0.062Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)$0.067DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)DeepSeek$0.067869 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic$0.062543 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 0.7 min (partial coverage); Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high): 9.7 min (partial coverage)0m2m5m8m10m0.7 minClaude Sonnet 5.5 (high)9.7 minDeepSeek V4 Flash (high)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)DeepSeek9.7 min869 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic0.7 min543 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), at 81 against 70 for Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high). Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high): 860 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 479 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), at $0.062 against $0.067 for Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), at 0.7 min against 9.7 min for Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) has no context window data.

More: Terminus-2 – DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) · Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) · all comparisons