Axis Spatial

DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code

DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex against Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash (high), CodexClaude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only5969
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo image input71
Earth-Bench V2 score5756
GeoBenchX score4777
GS-QA2 score7476
Vision agents scoreNo image input78
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8894
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8995
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)No data96
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)No data100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)No data77
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)No data100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score6869
GIS analysis score7575
Climate and time series score5859
Spatial statistics score3338
Making maps score6184
Recognising infeasible requests score3280
Cost per task$0.085$0.043
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)6.5 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt1.13M70k
Turns per attempt25.43.9
Input price per 1M tokens$0.44$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$1.32$10.00
Context window1,048,5761,000,000
Image inputNoYes
DeveloperDeepSeekAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 69; DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex: 59025507510069Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)59DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic69
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), CodexDeepSeek59

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.043; DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex: $0.085$0$0.025$0.05$0.075$0.10$0.043Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)$0.085DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.043
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), CodexDeepSeek$0.085

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex: 19k05k10k15k20k1kClaude Sonnet 5.5 (low)19kDeepSeek V4 Flash (high)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), CodexDeepSeek19k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 69 to 59.
Which is cheaper per task, DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.043 to $0.085.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 19k.
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex, 1,048,576 tokens to 1,000,000 tokens.

More: DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Codex · Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons