Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) vs. Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): geospatial agent comparison
Comparison between Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) and Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.
Side by side
| Metric | Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) | Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Geospatial Agent Index | 75* (attempts per task: 1.2) | 0* (attempts per task: 1 on 9 of 290 tasks so far) |
| GeoAgentBench score | 97 | No data |
| GeoBenchX score | 52 | No data |
| Earth-Bench score | 56 | 0 |
| GeoAnalystBench score | 95 | No data |
| Raster and remote sensing score | 73 | 0 |
| Vector and overlay score | 70 | No data |
| Networks and routing score | 100 | No data |
| Climate and time series score | 83 | 0 |
| Spatial statistics and interpolation score | 71 | No data |
| Mapping and cartography score | 76 | No data |
| Recognising infeasible requests score | 30 | No data |
| Cost per task | $0.272 | $0.247 |
| Time per task | 3.6 min | 15.6 min |
| Tokens per attempt | 70k | 693k |
| Turns per attempt | 6.3 | 25.7 |
| Attempts decided | 335 | 9 |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $3.00 | $0.35 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $15.00 | $0.56 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 128,000 |
| Image input | Yes | Yes |
| Developer | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
Charts
Geospatial Agent Index
Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
| Model | Creator | Geospatial Agent Index | Range while attempts are pending | Benchmarks covered | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) | Anthropic | 75* (attempts per task: 1.2) | 74 to 75 | 4 of 4 | 335 of 870 planned attempts (138 excluded) |
| Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) | Mistral AI | 0* (attempts per task: 1 on 9 of 290 tasks so far) | No pending judgements; coverage incomplete | 1 of 4 | 9 of 351 planned attempts |
Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high)Cost per task
Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Cost per task
| Model | Creator | Cost per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) | Anthropic | $0.272 | 343 of 870 planned attempts (138 excluded) |
| Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) | Mistral AI | $0.247 | 9 of 351 planned attempts |
Time per task
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Time per task
| Model | Creator | Time per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) | Anthropic | 3.6 min | 343 of 870 planned attempts (138 excluded) |
| Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) | Mistral AI | 15.6 min | 9 of 351 planned attempts |
Frequently asked questions
- Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Not comparable yet: Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) has scores on 1 of 4 benchmarks, so it is not yet ranked. Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high): 335 of 870 planned attempts (138 excluded). Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning): 9 of 351 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
- Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning), at $0.247 against $0.272 for Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high).
- Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high), at 3.6 min against 15.6 min for Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning).
- Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) or Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning)?
- Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high), at 1,000,000 tokens against 128,000 tokens for Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning).
More: Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) · Terminus-2 – Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Non-reasoning) · all comparisons