Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) vs. Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low): geospatial agent comparison
Comparison between Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) and Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.
Side by side
| Metric | Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) | Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) |
|---|---|---|
| Geospatial Agent Index | 65* (attempts per task: 1.1) | 64* (attempts per task: 2.9) |
| GeoAgentBench score | 96 | 96 |
| GeoBenchX score | 41 | 61 |
| Earth-Bench score | 39 | 37 |
| GeoAnalystBench score | 84 | 63 |
| Raster and remote sensing score | 63 | 62 |
| Vector and overlay score | 67 | 63 |
| Networks and routing score | 100 | 100 |
| Climate and time series score | 74 | 51 |
| Spatial statistics and interpolation score | 38 | 43 |
| Mapping and cartography score | 65 | 53 |
| Recognising infeasible requests score | 29 | 83 |
| Cost per task | $0.252 | $0.115 |
| Time per task | 3.4 min | 2.7 min |
| Tokens per attempt | 68k | 314k |
| Turns per attempt | 6.3 | 17.9 |
| Attempts decided | 295 | 833 |
| Input price per 1M tokens | $3.00 | $0.75 |
| Output price per 1M tokens | $15.00 | $3.75 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Image input | Yes | Yes |
| Developer | Anthropic |
Charts
Geospatial Agent Index
Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
| Model | Creator | Geospatial Agent Index | Range while attempts are pending | Benchmarks covered | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) | Anthropic | 65* (attempts per task: 1.1) | 62 to 66 | 4 of 4 | 295 of 1,167 planned attempts (149 excluded) |
| Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) | 64* (attempts per task: 2.9) | No pending judgements; coverage incomplete | 4 of 4 | 833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded) |
Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high)
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)Cost per task
Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Cost per task
| Model | Creator | Cost per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) | Anthropic | $0.252 | 331 of 1,167 planned attempts (149 excluded) |
| Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) | $0.115 | 833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded) |
Time per task
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
First eight selected entries in metric order. Full results in table view.
Data table: Time per task
| Model | Creator | Time per task | Coverage (attempts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) | Anthropic | 3.4 min | 331 of 1,167 planned attempts (149 excluded) |
| Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) | 2.7 min | 833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded) |
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)?
Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high), at 65 against 64 for Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low). Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high): 295 of 1,167 planned attempts (149 excluded). Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low): 833 of 1,167 planned attempts (74 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low), at $0.115 against $0.252 for Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high).
Which is faster per task, Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low), at 2.7 min against 3.4 min for Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high).
Which has the larger context window, Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) or Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)?
Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low), at 1,048,576 tokens against 1,000,000 tokens for Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high).
More: Terminus-2 – Claude Sonnet 4.6 (adaptive, effort high) · Terminus-2 – Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) · all comparisons