Axis Spatial

Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) vs. Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) and Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) vs. Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)
MetricClaude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)
Geospatial Agent Index27* (partial: attempt 1 on 52 of 565 tasks)72*
Earth-Bench V2 score2061
GeoBenchX score3369
GS-QA2 scoreNo data85
GeoAgentBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index)No data100
GeoAnalystBench score (guided GIS workflow; outside the index)No data100
Raster and remote sensing score1574
Vector and overlay scoreNo data82
Networks and routing scoreNo dataNo data
Climate and time series score068
Spatial statistics and interpolation score2029
Mapping and cartography score6478
Recognising infeasible requests score2670
Cost per task$0.089$0.049
Time per task13.6 min1.2 min
Tokens per attempt1.37M93k
Turns per attempt35.55.9
Attempts decided49565
Input price per 1M tokens$0.06$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.40$10.00
Context window131,072No data
Image inputNoNo data
DeveloperZ.aiOpenAI

Charts

Partial coverage. Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 10 of 147 Earth-Bench V2 tasks; 42 of 173 GeoBenchX tasks; GS-QA2 incomplete. Grey placeholders identify these entries in the index, cost and output token charts; their height does not represent a value. Comparable bars appear when first-attempt coverage is complete. Their available results remain in the side-by-side table.

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Planned attempts still to come
Geospatial Agent IndexCodex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium): 72* (partial coverage); Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): Partial025507510072*GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)PartialGLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)OpenAI72*No pending judgements; coverage incomplete; 208 results awaiting review3 of 3565 of 859 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Planned attempts still to come
Cost per taskCodex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium): $0.049 (partial coverage); Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): Partial$0$0.013$0.025$0.038$0.050$0.049GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)PartialGLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)
How to read this chart

Not shown: partial coverage. Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on).

Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)OpenAI$0.049565 of 859 planned attempts

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

  • Planned attempts still to come
Output tokens per taskCodex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium): 1k (partial coverage); Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): Partial03757501k2k1kGPT-6.1 Sol (medium)PartialGLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on)
How to read this chart

Not shown: partial coverage. Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on).

Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelCreatorOutput tokens per taskCoverage (attempts)
Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)OpenAI1k565 of 859 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)?
Not comparable yet: Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) has partial coverage (10 of 147 Earth-Bench V2 tasks; 42 of 173 GeoBenchX tasks; GS-QA2 incomplete), so it is not ranked. Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on): 49 of 614 planned attempts. Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium): 565 of 859 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)?
Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium), at $0.049 against $0.089 for Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on).
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)?
Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium), at 1k against 17k for Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on).
Which has the larger context window, Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) or Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)?
Not known yet: Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium) has no context window data.

More: Claude Code – GLM-4.7-Flash (thinking on) · Codex – GPT-6.1 Sol (medium) · all comparisons