Axis Spatial

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code against Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code
MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeClaude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only6974
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision7174
Earth-Bench V2 score5669
GeoBenchX score7773
GS-QA2 score7679
Vision agents score7877
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9496
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)95100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)9695
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)7777
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)10092
Remote sensing and raster analysis score6979
GIS analysis score7575
Climate and time series score5971
Spatial statistics score3838
Making maps score8482
Recognising infeasible requests score8070
Cost per task$0.043$0.34
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.4 min0.9 min
Tokens per attempt70k245k
Turns per attempt3.97.0
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$5.00
Output price per 1M tokens$10.00$25.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code: 74; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 69025507510074Claude Opus 4.7 (high)69Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic74
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic69

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.043; Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code: $0.34$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.043Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)$0.34Claude Opus 4.7 (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.043
Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.34

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code: 4k02k3k4k6k1kClaude Sonnet 5.5 (low)4kClaude Opus 4.7 (high)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic4k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code or Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code, 74 to 69.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code or Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.043 to $0.34.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code or Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 4k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code or Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code · Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code · All comparisons