Axis Spatial

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code against Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude CodeClaude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7874
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision7878
Earth-Bench V2 score7159
GeoBenchX score8177
GS-QA2 score8386
Vision agents score7889
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9896
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)100100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)9695
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)7779
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)100100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score8079
GIS analysis score8684
Climate and time series score6959
Spatial statistics score6277
Making maps score8477
Recognising infeasible requests score8077
Cost per task$0.055$0.081
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.6 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt94k63k
Turns per attempt4.83.5
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$4.00
Output price per 1M tokens$10.00$20.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 78; Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 74025507510078Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)74Claude Opus 5.5 (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic78
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic74

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code: $0.055; Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.081$0$0.025$0.05$0.075$0.10$0.055Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)$0.081Claude Opus 5.5 (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.055
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.081

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 2k05001k2k2k1kClaude Opus 5.5 (low)2kClaude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic2k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code, 78 to 74.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code, $0.055 to $0.081.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 2k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code · Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons