Axis Spatial

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code against Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude CodeClaude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7870
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision7872
Earth-Bench V2 score7162
GeoBenchX score8173
GS-QA2 score8375
Vision agents score7877
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9892
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)100100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)9695
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)7772
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)10092
Remote sensing and raster analysis score8072
GIS analysis score8673
Climate and time series score6964
Spatial statistics score6238
Making maps score8479
Recognising infeasible requests score8073
Cost per task$0.055$0.0053
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.6 min0.9 min
Tokens per attempt94k181k
Turns per attempt4.85.5
Input price per 1M tokens$2.00$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens$10.00$0.50
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 78; Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 70025507510078Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)70Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic78
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic70

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.0053; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code: $0.055$0$0.015$0.03$0.045$0.06$0.0053Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)$0.055Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.0053
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.055

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 2k; Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 3k01k2k3k4k2kClaude Sonnet 5.5 (high)3kClaude Haiku 5.5 (low)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic2k
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic3k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code, 78 to 70.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.0053 to $0.055.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code, 2k to 3k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), Claude Code · Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons