Axis Spatial

Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code against Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeClaude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only8570
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision8872
Earth-Bench V2 score7762
GeoBenchX score8373
GS-QA2 score9475
Vision agents score9777
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9892
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)100100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)9695
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)7972
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)10092
Remote sensing and raster analysis score8972
GIS analysis score9473
Climate and time series score7564
Spatial statistics score6238
Making maps score8879
Recognising infeasible requests score8273
Cost per task$0.25$0.0053
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)1.4 min0.9 min
Tokens per attempt174k181k
Turns per attempt6.95.5
Input price per 1M tokens$4.00$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens$20.00$0.50
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code: 85; Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 70025507510085Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)70Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeAnthropic85
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic70

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.0053; Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code: $0.25$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.0053Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)$0.25Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.0053
Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.25

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 3k; Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code: 5k02k3k4k6k3kClaude Haiku 5.5 (low)5kClaude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic3k
Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude CodeAnthropic5k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code, 85 to 70.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.0053 to $0.25.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 3k to 5k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), Claude Code · Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons