Axis Spatial

Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code against Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeClaude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only8069
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data71
Earth-Bench V2 score7256
GeoBenchX score7977
GS-QA2 score9076
Vision agents scoreNo data78
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9894
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9595
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)9796
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)7977
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)100100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score8369
GIS analysis score9275
Climate and time series score7359
Spatial statistics score4638
Making maps score8684
Recognising infeasible requests score8080
Cost per task$0.11$0.043
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.5 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt91k70k
Turns per attempt4.83.9
Input price per 1M tokens$4.00$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$20.00$10.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: 80; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 69025507510080Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)69Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic80
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic69

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.043; Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: $0.11$0$0.05$0.10$0.15$0.20$0.043Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)$0.11Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.043
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.11

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: 2k05001k2k2k1kClaude Sonnet 5.5 (low)2kClaude Opus 5.5 (medium)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic2k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code, 80 to 69.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.043 to $0.11.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 2k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code · Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons