Axis Spatial

Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) vs. Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) and Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) vs. Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)
MetricClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)
Geospatial Agent Index81* (partial: 1.8 of 3 attempts)82 (partial: 1 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score9698
GeoBenchX score6669
Earth-Bench score6262
GeoAnalystBench score100100
Raster and remote sensing score7683
Vector and overlay score8389
Networks and routing score100100
Climate and time series score8575
Spatial statistics and interpolation score6971
Mapping and cartography score7577
Recognising infeasible requests score6062
Cost per task$0.138$0.375
Time per task0.7 min2.1 min
Tokens per attempt103k266k
Turns per attempt4.98.7
Attempts decided461290
Input price per 1M tokens$4.00$4.00
Output price per 1M tokens$20.00$20.00
Context windowNo dataNo data
Image inputNo dataNo data
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh): 82; Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium): 81* (partial coverage)025507510082Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)81*Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)Anthropic82 (partial: 1 of 3 attempts)No pending judgements4 of 4290 of 290 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)Anthropic81* (partial: 1.8 of 3 attempts)70 to 814 of 4461 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium): $0.138 (partial coverage); Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh): $0.375$0$0.100$0.200$0.300$0.400$0.138Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)$0.375Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)Anthropic$0.138532 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)Anthropic$0.375290 of 290 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium): 0.7 min (partial coverage); Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh): 2.1 min0m1m1m2m2m0.7 minClaude Opus 5.5 (medium)2.1 minClaude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)Anthropic0.7 min532 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)Anthropic2.1 min290 of 290 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) or Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)?
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh), at 82 against 81 for Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium). Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium): 461 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh): 290 of 290 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) or Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)?
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), at $0.138 against $0.375 for Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh).
Which is faster per task, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) or Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)?
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), at 0.7 min against 2.1 min for Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh).
Which has the larger context window, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) or Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) has no context window data and Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh) has no context window data.

More: Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) · Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh) · all comparisons