Axis Spatial

Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code against Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeClaude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only8074
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data78
Earth-Bench V2 score7259
GeoBenchX score7977
GS-QA2 score9086
Vision agents scoreNo data89
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9896
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)95100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)9795
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)7979
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)100100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score8379
GIS analysis score9284
Climate and time series score7359
Spatial statistics score4677
Making maps score8677
Recognising infeasible requests score8077
Cost per task$0.11$0.081
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.5 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt91k63k
Turns per attempt4.83.5
Input price per 1M tokens$4.00$4.00
Output price per 1M tokens$20.00$20.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: 80; Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 74025507510080Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)74Claude Opus 5.5 (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic80
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic74

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.081; Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: $0.11$0$0.05$0.10$0.15$0.20$0.081Claude Opus 5.5 (low)$0.11Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.081
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.11

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: 2k05001k2k2k1kClaude Opus 5.5 (low)2kClaude Opus 5.5 (medium)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic2k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code, 80 to 74.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.081 to $0.11.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 2k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Opus 5.5 (medium), Claude Code · Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons