Axis Spatial

Search modelsMenu

Claude Opus 5.5 (max) vs GPT-6 Sol (high)

Results updated 3 November 2026 · In Claude Code and Codex, so part of any gap can come from the harness · How we benchmark

Verdict

Claude Opus 5.5 (max)Not yet rankedGeospatial Agent Index
GPT-6 Sol (high)80Geospatial Agent Index · rank 8 of 78

Not comparable yet: Claude Opus 5.5 (max) is not yet ranked.

Cost per task
$0.83 vs $0.082
Time per task
4.5 min (estimated) vs 0.8 min
Tokens per attempt
530k vs 147k
Image input
Yes vs Yes

Claude Opus 5.5 (max), Claude Code scores higher on GS-QA2 and Vision agents; GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex scores higher on Earth-Bench V2 and GeoBenchX. GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex is cheaper and faster: $0.082 against $0.83 per task, and 0.8 min against 4.5 min.

Not yet ranked. Claude Opus 5.5 (max), Claude Code. Not in the Agent Index, cost and time charts until it has a score on every index evaluation. Results so far are in the side-by-side table.

Where they differ most

By kind of work, share of tasks passed, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Kind of workClaude Opus 5.5 (max)GPT-6 Sol (high)
Climate and time series6080
Spatial statistics5038
GIS analysis9386
Making maps7784
World map of the places the tasks are setWhere the tasks are set: each kind of work links to its tasks and scores
Leaderboard

Charts for each: Claude Opus 5.5 (max), Claude Code · GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5 (max), Claude Code vs. GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex
MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (max), Claude CodeGPT-6 Sol (high), Codex
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7980
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data80
Earth-Bench V2 score7175
GeoBenchX score7475
GS-QA2 score9289
Vision agents score9880
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)100100
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)100100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)95No data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100No data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)76No data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)100No data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score8883
GIS analysis score9386
Climate and time series score6080
Spatial statistics score5038
Making maps score7784
Recognising infeasible requests score7978
Cost per task$0.83$0.082
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)4.5 min (estimated)0.8 min
Tokens per attempt530k147k
Turns per attempt12.08.7
Input price per 1M tokens$4.00$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$20.00$10.00
Context window1,000,0001,050,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Opus 5.5 (max), Claude Code or GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex?
Not comparable yet: Claude Opus 5.5 (max), Claude Code is not yet ranked.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (max), Claude Code or GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex?
GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex, $0.082 to $0.83.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (max), Claude Code or GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex?
GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex, 3k to 23k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 (max), Claude Code or GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex?
GPT-6 Sol (high), Codex, 1,050,000 tokens to 1,000,000 tokens.