Axis Spatial

Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code vs. GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex

Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code against GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. The harnesses differ, so part of any gap can come from the harness. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code vs. GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex
MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeGPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7469
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision7869
Earth-Bench V2 score5962
GeoBenchX score7767
GS-QA2 score8680
Vision agents score8969
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9696
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)10095
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)95No data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100No data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)79No data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)100No data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score7976
GIS analysis score8477
Climate and time series score5961
Spatial statistics score7746
Making maps score7774
Recognising infeasible requests score7760
Cost per task$0.081$0.10
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.4 min0.8 min
Tokens per attempt63k162k
Turns per attempt3.59.6
Input price per 1M tokens$4.00$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$20.00$12.00
Context window1,000,0001,050,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 74; GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex: 69025507510074Claude Opus 5.5 (low)69GPT-5.6 Terra (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic74
GPT-5.6 Terra (high), CodexOpenAI69

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.081; GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex: $0.10$0$0.05$0.10$0.15$0.20$0.081Claude Opus 5.5 (low)$0.10GPT-5.6 Terra (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.081
GPT-5.6 Terra (high), CodexOpenAI$0.10

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex: 3k01k2k3k4k1kClaude Opus 5.5 (low)3kGPT-5.6 Terra (high)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
GPT-5.6 Terra (high), CodexOpenAI3k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code or GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 74 to 69.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code or GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.081 to $0.10.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code or GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 3k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code or GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex?
GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex, 1,050,000 tokens to 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code · GPT-5.6 Terra (high), Codex · All comparisons