Axis Spatial

Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) and Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
MetricClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
Geospatial Agent Index83* (partial: 1.7 of 3 attempts)81* (partial: 1.9 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score96100
GeoBenchX score6667
Earth-Bench score6958
GeoAnalystBench score10097
Raster and remote sensing score8479
Vector and overlay score8381
Networks and routing score100100
Climate and time series score7979
Spatial statistics and interpolation score6273
Mapping and cartography score7676
Recognising infeasible requests score5961
Cost per task$0.175$0.062
Time per task1.0 min0.7 min
Tokens per attempt127k95k
Turns per attempt5.74.6
Attempts decided422479
Input price per 1M tokens$4.00$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$20.00$10.00
Context windowNo dataNo data
Image inputNo dataNo data
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): 83* (partial coverage); Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 81* (partial coverage)025507510083*Claude Opus 5.5 (high)81*Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Anthropic83* (partial: 1.7 of 3 attempts)71 to 834 of 4422 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic81* (partial: 1.9 of 3 attempts)71 to 824 of 4479 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): $0.062 (partial coverage); Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): $0.175 (partial coverage)$0$0.050$0.100$0.150$0.200$0.062Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)$0.175Claude Opus 5.5 (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Anthropic$0.175496 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic$0.062543 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 0.7 min (partial coverage); Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): 1.0 min (partial coverage)0m0m0m1m1m0.7 minClaude Sonnet 5.5 (high)1.0 minClaude Opus 5.5 (high)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Anthropic1.0 min496 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)Anthropic0.7 min543 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded)

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high), at 83 against 81 for Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high). Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): 422 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): 479 of 870 planned attempts (236 excluded). Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), at $0.062 against $0.175 for Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high).
Which is faster per task, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high), at 0.7 min against 1.0 min for Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high).
Which has the larger context window, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) or Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) has no context window data and Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) has no context window data.

More: Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) · Claude Code – Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high) · all comparisons