Axis Spatial

Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code against Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude CodeClaude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only8270
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision8472
Earth-Bench V2 score7962
GeoBenchX score7973
GS-QA2 score9075
Vision agents score8977
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)10092
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)100100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)9595
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)7872
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)10092
Remote sensing and raster analysis score8872
GIS analysis score8973
Climate and time series score7564
Spatial statistics score5438
Making maps score8679
Recognising infeasible requests score7873
Cost per task$0.13$0.0053
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.7 min0.9 min
Tokens per attempt108k181k
Turns per attempt5.35.5
Input price per 1M tokens$4.00$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens$20.00$0.50
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 82; Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 70025507510082Claude Opus 5.5 (high)70Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic82
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic70

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.0053; Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code: $0.13$0$0.05$0.10$0.15$0.20$0.0053Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)$0.13Claude Opus 5.5 (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.0053
Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.13

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 2k; Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 3k01k2k3k4k2kClaude Opus 5.5 (high)3kClaude Haiku 5.5 (low)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic2k
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic3k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code, 82 to 70.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.0053 to $0.13.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code, 2k to 3k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Opus 5.5 (high), Claude Code · Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons