Axis Spatial

Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) and Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) vs. Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)
MetricClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)
Geospatial Agent Index83* (partial: 1.7 of 3 attempts)75* (partial: 1.7 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score9698
GeoBenchX score6661
Earth-Bench score6951
GeoAnalystBench score10089
Raster and remote sensing score8469
Vector and overlay score8375
Networks and routing score100100
Climate and time series score7979
Spatial statistics and interpolation score6258
Mapping and cartography score7675
Recognising infeasible requests score5956
Cost per task$0.175$0.010
Time per task1.0 min1.1 min
Tokens per attempt127k328k
Turns per attempt5.78.1
Attempts decided422422
Input price per 1M tokens$4.00$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens$20.00$0.50
Context windowNo dataNo data
Image inputNo dataNo data
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): 83* (partial coverage); Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): 75* (partial coverage)025507510083*Claude Opus 5.5 (high)75*Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Anthropic83* (partial: 1.7 of 3 attempts)71 to 834 of 4422 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)Anthropic75* (partial: 1.7 of 3 attempts)66 to 774 of 4422 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskClaude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): $0.010 (partial coverage); Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): $0.175 (partial coverage)$0$0.050$0.100$0.150$0.200$0.010Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)$0.175Claude Opus 5.5 (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Anthropic$0.175496 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)Anthropic$0.010485 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): 1.0 min (partial coverage); Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): 1.1 min (partial coverage)0m0m1m1m1m1.0 minClaude Opus 5.5 (high)1.1 minClaude Haiku 5.5 (high)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Anthropic1.0 min496 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)Anthropic1.1 min485 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high), at 83 against 75 for Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high). Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high): 422 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): 422 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), at $0.010 against $0.175 for Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high).
Which is faster per task, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high), at 1.0 min against 1.1 min for Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high).
Which has the larger context window, Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) has no context window data and Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) has no context window data.

More: Claude Code – Claude Opus 5.5 (high) · Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) · all comparisons