Axis Spatial

Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code against Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricClaude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeClaude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7274
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + visionNo data78
Earth-Bench V2 score6859
GeoBenchX score7177
GS-QA2 score7986
Vision agents scoreNo data89
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9496
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)95100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)9595
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)7379
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)92100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score7679
GIS analysis score8084
Climate and time series score6659
Spatial statistics score2377
Making maps score7977
Recognising infeasible requests score7377
Cost per task$0.0063$0.081
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)1.0 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt210k63k
Turns per attempt6.13.5
Input price per 1M tokens$0.10$4.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.50$20.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 74; Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: 72025507510074Claude Opus 5.5 (low)72Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic74
Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic72

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: $0.0063; Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.081$0$0.025$0.05$0.075$0.10$0.0063Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)$0.081Claude Opus 5.5 (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.0063
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.081

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code: 4k01k2k3k4k1kClaude Opus 5.5 (low)4kClaude Haiku 5.5 (medium)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude CodeAnthropic4k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 74 to 72.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code, $0.0063 to $0.081.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 4k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), Claude Code · Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons