Axis Spatial

Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) vs. Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): geospatial agent comparison

Comparison between Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) and Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) on the Geospatial Agent Index, each benchmark, cost, time and token use, from the same tasks, agent and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) vs. Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)
MetricClaude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)
Geospatial Agent Index77* (partial: 1.8 of 3 attempts)75* (partial: 1.7 of 3 attempts)
GeoAgentBench score9898
GeoBenchX score6161
Earth-Bench score5351
GeoAnalystBench score9589
Raster and remote sensing score7069
Vector and overlay score8175
Networks and routing score100100
Climate and time series score7779
Spatial statistics and interpolation score6558
Mapping and cartography score7475
Recognising infeasible requests score5556
Cost per task$0.0075$0.010
Time per task0.8 min1.1 min
Tokens per attempt235k328k
Turns per attempt6.48.1
Attempts decided462422
Input price per 1M tokens$0.10$0.10
Output price per 1M tokens$0.50$0.50
Context windowNo dataNo data
Image inputNo dataNo data
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal-weight average of the evaluation scores, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

  • Partial coverage
Geospatial Agent IndexClaude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium): 77* (partial coverage); Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): 75* (partial coverage)025507510077*Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)75*Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelCreatorGeospatial Agent IndexRange while attempts are pendingBenchmarks coveredCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)Anthropic77* (partial: 1.8 of 3 attempts)66 to 784 of 4462 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)Anthropic75* (partial: 1.7 of 3 attempts)66 to 774 of 4422 of 870 planned attempts

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Cost per taskClaude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium): $0.0075 (partial coverage); Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): $0.010 (partial coverage)$0$0.0030$0.0060$0.0090$0.012$0.0075Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)$0.010Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelCreatorCost per taskCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)Anthropic$0.0075524 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)Anthropic$0.010485 of 870 planned attempts

Time per task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

  • Partial coverage
Time per taskClaude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium): 0.8 min (partial coverage); Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): 1.1 min (partial coverage)0m0m1m1m1m0.8 minClaude Haiku 5.5 (medium)1.1 minClaude Haiku 5.5 (high)
Data table: Time per task
Time per task
ModelCreatorTime per taskCoverage (attempts)
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium)Anthropic0.8 min524 of 870 planned attempts
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)Anthropic1.1 min485 of 870 planned attempts

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), at 77 against 75 for Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high). Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium): 462 of 870 planned attempts. Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): 422 of 870 planned attempts. Coverage is partial; scores can change as more attempts are decided.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), at $0.0075 against $0.010 for Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high).
Which is faster per task, Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium), at 0.8 min against 1.1 min for Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high).
Which has the larger context window, Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) or Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)?
Not known yet: Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) has no context window data and Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) has no context window data.

More: Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) · Claude Code – Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) · all comparisons