Axis Spatial

Search modelsMenu

Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) vs GPT-6 Sol (medium)

Results updated 3 November 2026 · In Claude Code and Codex, so part of any gap can come from the harness · How we benchmark

Verdict

Claude Haiku 5.5 (max)78Geospatial Agent Index · rank 11 of 78
GPT-6 Sol (medium)Not yet rankedGeospatial Agent Index

Not comparable yet: GPT-6 Sol (medium) is not yet ranked.

Cost per task
$0.079 vs $0.047
Time per task
7.8 min (estimated) vs 0.3 min
Tokens per attempt
859k vs 86k
Image input
Yes vs Yes

Claude Haiku 5.5 (max), Claude Code scores higher on GeoBenchX; GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex scores higher on Earth-Bench V2 and Vision agents; they are level on GS-QA2. GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex is cheaper and faster: $0.047 against $0.079 per task, and 0.3 min against 7.8 min.

Not yet ranked. GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex. Not in the Agent Index, cost and time charts until it has a score on every index evaluation. Results so far are in the side-by-side table.

Where they differ most

By kind of work, share of tasks passed, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Kind of workClaude Haiku 5.5 (max)GPT-6 Sol (medium)
Making maps85100
Recognising infeasible requests8675
Remote sensing and raster analysis7788
GIS analysis9183
World map of the places the tasks are setWhere the tasks are set: each kind of work links to its tasks and scores
Leaderboard

Charts for each: Claude Haiku 5.5 (max), Claude Code · GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 (max), Claude Code vs. GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex
MetricClaude Haiku 5.5 (max), Claude CodeGPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7880
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision79No data
Earth-Bench V2 score7077
GeoBenchX score7875
GS-QA2 score8787
Vision agents score8191
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)97100
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)100No data
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)97No data
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100No data
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)76No data
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)96No data
Remote sensing and raster analysis score7788
GIS analysis score9183
Climate and time series score7676
Spatial statistics score4550
Making maps score85100
Recognising infeasible requests score8675
Cost per task$0.079$0.047
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)7.8 min (estimated)0.3 min
Tokens per attempt859k86k
Turns per attempt13.16.4
Input price per 1M tokens$0.10$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.50$10.00
Context window1,000,0001,050,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Haiku 5.5 (max), Claude Code or GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex?
Not comparable yet: GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex is not yet ranked.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 (max), Claude Code or GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex?
GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex, $0.047 to $0.079.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 (max), Claude Code or GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex?
GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex, 1k to 43k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 (max), Claude Code or GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex?
GPT-6 Sol (medium), Codex, 1,050,000 tokens to 1,000,000 tokens.