Axis Spatial

Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code

Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code against Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code
MetricClaude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeClaude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7074
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision7274
Earth-Bench V2 score6269
GeoBenchX score7373
GS-QA2 score7579
Vision agents score7777
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9296
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)100100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)9595
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)7277
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)9292
Remote sensing and raster analysis score7279
GIS analysis score7375
Climate and time series score6471
Spatial statistics score3838
Making maps score7982
Recognising infeasible requests score7370
Cost per task$0.0053$0.34
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)0.9 min0.9 min
Tokens per attempt181k245k
Turns per attempt5.57.0
Input price per 1M tokens$0.10$5.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.50$25.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code: 74; Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 70025507510074Claude Opus 4.7 (high)70Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic74
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic70

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.0053; Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code: $0.34$0$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40$0.0053Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)$0.34Claude Opus 4.7 (high)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.0053
Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.34

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 3k; Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code: 4k02k3k4k6k3kClaude Haiku 5.5 (low)4kClaude Opus 4.7 (high)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic3k
Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic4k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code or Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code, 74 to 70.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code or Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code, $0.0053 to $0.34.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code or Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 3k to 4k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code or Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Haiku 5.5 (low), Claude Code · Claude Opus 4.7 (high), Claude Code · All comparisons