Axis Spatial

Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code against Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricClaude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude CodeClaude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7669
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision7471
Earth-Bench V2 score7256
GeoBenchX score7277
GS-QA2 score8376
Vision agents score7078
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9894
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)8495
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)9696
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)7477
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)92100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score7969
GIS analysis score8275
Climate and time series score7659
Spatial statistics score3138
Making maps score8184
Recognising infeasible requests score7380
Cost per task$0.0085$0.043
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)1.4 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt271k70k
Turns per attempt7.13.9
Input price per 1M tokens$0.10$2.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.50$10.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 76; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 69025507510076Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)69Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic76
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic69

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code: $0.0085; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.043$0$0.015$0.03$0.045$0.06$0.0085Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)$0.043Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.0085
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.043

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 6k02k3k4k6k1kClaude Sonnet 5.5 (low)6kClaude Haiku 5.5 (high)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic6k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code, 76 to 69.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code, $0.0085 to $0.043.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 6k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code · Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons