Axis Spatial

Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code

Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code against Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: Geospatial Agent Index, each evaluation, cost, time and tokens, on the same tasks and limits. Methodology.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
MetricClaude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude CodeClaude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code
Geospatial Agent Index: Text only7674
Geospatial Agent Index: Text + vision7478
Earth-Bench V2 score7259
GeoBenchX score7277
GS-QA2 score8386
Vision agents score7089
GeoAgentBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)9896
GeoAnalystBench score (Guided workflows; not in the Agent Index)84100
OGD4All score (standalone; in no index)9695
GeoNatureAgent score (standalone; in no index)100100
MultiGlobeQA score (standalone; in no index)7479
GeoAgentEval score (standalone; in no index)92100
Remote sensing and raster analysis score7979
GIS analysis score8284
Climate and time series score7659
Spatial statistics score3177
Making maps score8177
Recognising infeasible requests score7377
Cost per task$0.0085$0.081
Time per task (at 100 output tokens/s)1.4 min0.4 min
Tokens per attempt271k63k
Turns per attempt7.13.5
Input price per 1M tokens$0.10$4.00
Output price per 1M tokens$0.50$20.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Image inputYesYes
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic

Charts

Geospatial Agent Index

Equal average of Earth-Bench V2, GeoBenchX and GS-QA2, 0 to 100 · Higher is better

Geospatial Agent IndexScores 0 to 100: Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 76; Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 74025507510076Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)74Claude Opus 5.5 (low)
Data table: Geospatial Agent Index
Geospatial Agent Index
ModelDeveloperGeospatial Agent Index
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic76
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic74

Cost per task

Average cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Cost per taskCost per task in US dollars: Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code: $0.0085; Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: $0.081$0$0.025$0.05$0.075$0.10$0.0085Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)$0.081Claude Opus 5.5 (low)
Data table: Cost per task
Cost per task
ModelDeveloperCost per task
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.0085
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic$0.081

Output tokens per task

Average output tokens per attempt, reasoning included · Lower is better

Output tokens per taskOutput tokens per task: Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code: 1k; Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code: 6k02k3k4k6k1kClaude Opus 5.5 (low)6kClaude Haiku 5.5 (high)
Data table: Output tokens per task
Output tokens per task
ModelDeveloperOutput tokens per task
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude CodeAnthropic1k
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude CodeAnthropic6k

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher on the Geospatial Agent Index, Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code, 76 to 74.
Which is cheaper per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code, $0.0085 to $0.081.
Which writes fewer output tokens per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code, 1k to 6k.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code or Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code?
They are level, at 1,000,000 tokens.

More: Claude Haiku 5.5 (high), Claude Code · Claude Opus 5.5 (low), Claude Code · All comparisons